The ANC’s integrity commission (IC) has criticised President Cyril Ramaphosa for seemingly giving it the runaround for 18 months instead of answering questions about the controversial CR17 campaign funds.
In a report dated December 21, chairperson George Mashamba expressed the commission’s disappointment with Ramaphosa’s reluctance to discuss the CR17 campaign funds until the courts had finalised the matter.
“To insist the legal process must conclude to avoid appearing before the IC on the basis that matters are before the courts distorts the role of the IC, undermines the work of the IC and presents an unnecessary delay to the work of the IC,” read the report.
The commission was also not impressed with Ramaphosa trying to have his legal adviser present at their meeting, which is not allowed by the commission’s terms of reference.
Mashamba wrote that the IC first requested to meet Ramaphosa in 2018 when the issue of Bosasa and the CR17 campaign funds first arose.
“The IC identified this as a very important and sensitive issue for the organisation, and anticipated that this was going to do damage to the reputation and good standing of the ANC,” he said.
Without Ramaphosa, the state capture inquiry’s work would be incomplete: Zondo
State capture commission chairperson Raymond Zondo has announced that President Cyril Ramaphosa will appear to give evidence at the inquiry before …
POLITICS2 days ago
“The use of such allegedly huge sums of money for individual leadership campaigns was a departure from the internal democratic procedures of the organisation and was having a negative impact on the organisation.
“It was therefore a great disappointment to the IC when the president explained to the chairperson of the commission that since this was a legal matter, he did not feel it was right to discuss the CR17 campaign funds until the legal matter was finalised.”
Mashamba revealed that the commission pursued the matter and made several requests, verbally and in writing, to meet Ramaphosa over an 18-month period.
“It did not sit well with the IC that the president especially, but also the [top six] officials, continually referred publicly to the importance of the IC and the work being done, but in reality there was little to no interaction.”
According to the report, Ramaphosa finally engaged with the commission via a video conference on November 19, at the IC’s request, and with the main purpose of soliciting and exchanging views on funding for campaigns for individuals seeking to hold office in the ANC.
The meeting wanted to focus on the principle of the use of money in individual leadership campaigns within the organisation going forward, said Mashamba.
“However, with regard to the buying of votes subsequent to the 2017 conference, the IC strongly recommends that if any comrade has irrefutable evidence of this, it must be brought to the notice of the disciplinary committee as a matter of urgency,” he said.
Mashamba said the issue of the use of money in buying votes, especially in relation to leadership positions, kept arising in the media and public arena.
“It is obvious to the commission that this issue is becoming increasingly divisive and is being used as an instrument to further factional divisions at all levels of the organisation. This is damaging the reputation of the organisation,” he wrote.
According to Mashamba, Ramaphosa accepted the commission’s approach and offered to send a 69-page presentation he had prepared, which he had not done.